The CDC is weak on Babesia and seems to have no update in 16 months. That is fine. Much to do in the infinity of the voluminous infections number. But this is very helpful below. This is what the CDC feels is useful to physicians and laboratory scientists and I assume microbiology parasitologists. I am familiar with most, but not an expert in any. I would send you to someone who is more familiar with these.
Since I have the entire ivy league education course to pass the infectious disease specialty board, including a trivial coverage of Babesia, I do see many of these are covered and am thankful to those who learn so much. But why the silly game of acting like they know Babesia, Bartonella, Lyme disease, TBRF, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and other infections carried by ticks, fleas, and others? Why despise people spending 5000 hours reading what you have obviously not read or studied or treated?
As soon as you act like Shakespear, to a smart 135 IQ reading patient, you become absurd and a peculiar pretend actor. They already have your “guideline,” since they are given it for informed consent, if they have not already come across physicians or nurse practitioners who are “faithful devoted believers,” so they know why you reject these possible causes almost always.
You stick to what you do like to treat all these below, with our deep, honest and real thanks, and why play pretend about Babesia, Bartonella, Biofilm and Cystic Lyme, and others I mentioned above?
Thank you for learning how to treat these which the CDC has provided for the USA and world citizens to see: