I was listening to a top LL MD who I like a great deal, talking about a product as the magic bullet in destroying biofilms.
That fact any company is trying to treat this disaster, very unappreciated in the treatment of Lyme and Bartonella, is sincerely appreciated.
1. I met an ND who is with this company and he was brilliant and interesting. And met a nurse selling it that was more selling without content. It “worked for me, it will work for all of your patients”
2. The content is a proprietary blend. When I worked in nutritional companies, learning more than directing, the “proprietary secret” formula was meant to mean, “You have to trust us.” Or “We do not want to be accountable.” Or “We do not want our secret recipe stolen.” Notice how we are guessing. Most top products list exactly what is present and the form, amounts, and other important things like 3rd party tests. They are very competitive because they are excellent products that everyone can see and evaluate.
3. Paternal proprietary says we are more knowledgeable and here is our higher knowledge solution, as opposed to 99% of the nutraceutical standard which is: listing exact parts, form and amounts so they are subject to your examination, or a physician’s evaluation
4. What evidence shows it destroys Lyme or Bartonella biofilm?
5. The product has 30 components offering 600 mg a capsule. It is reasonable to believe three agents are more effective than one. But you are reducing the dose from 600 mg of one herb to three herbs at 200 mg. And if you use 20 components you are at 30 mg for each of the 20 herbs. This is not a criticism. I have a bottle of cryptolepis supreme in 400 mg capsules. In our Herb and Essential oils book we report cryptolepis kills Lyme, Bartonella and Babesia. But the benefit we see is dose dependent. 1200 mg a day is more effective than 400 mg a day. Will their components be high enough in milligrams as they apply, more diverse biofilm killing agents are more important than doses?
6. Every simple component of the product is very well known to anyone who has studied herbal pharmacology. That is a good thing and a concern. They use things with a long history in herbal medicine. But since I have used all but two, I do not see profoundly low doses working synergistically to destroy biofilms. And we have evidence coming out in our Bartonella book that shows destruction of Bartonella biofilms in humans.
7. I think it is possible this product stuns, drops reproduction, inflammatory fluid or kills some tick and flea infections. That does not mean it is destroying a biofilm inside the 60,000 miles of human body tubing. You swallow the product, it is diluted in stomach acid and stool in the small intestine, and then is diluted in your 9 to 12 pints of blood. And then it arrives at a potency that is effective.
SHOW EACH COMPONENT FORM, MILLIGRAMS AND EVIDENCE IN HUMANS, THAT ARE 500X MORE COMPLEX THAN A LAB STUDY…. THEN YOU CAN ADVERTISE YOU ARE A BIOFILM DESTROYER.
FOR NOW IT IS A GOOD START TO TRY TO DO THE NEAR IMPOSSIBLE.
WHAT OVER 600 SUBSTANCES UTTERLY FAIL AT DOING–DEFEATING BIOFILMS
Released 2014.
But new discoveries monthly